Kee v. . Dillingham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.
The defendants’ demurrer ore terms, interposed in the court below, on the ground that the plaintiffs’ complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action was properly overruled, as was their demurrer to the plaintiffs’ evidence. While some of the matters complained of as grounds for the relief sought would seem to involve mere expressions of opinion or promissory representations, we think there are allegations and evidence in support which under the principle stated in Bank v. Yelverton, 185 N. C., 314, 117 S. E., 299, are sufficient to withstand a demurrer and to carry…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lewis v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Spencer v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Ward v. . HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. YelvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Canady v. MannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Opsahl v. Pinehurst Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Collier v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Bank v. . YelvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Lumsden v. LawingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.