Dollison v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Pomeroy,
TMs appeal challenges the correctness of the trial court’s refusal of appellant’s motion for a new trial following a jury verdict in appellee’s favor as a result of injuries sustained by appellee in a grade crossing-accident. Most of tbe reasons assigned for a new trial concern alleged errors in the court’s charge; one involves the admission of certain evidence; the others have to do with the weight of the evidence showing disability and the alleged excessiveness of the verdict.
We have reviewed the voluminous record 2 and scrutinized carefully the charge and the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Whitner v. LojeskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Glass v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Harman Et Ux. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Anstine v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Haller v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ford v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Frank v. PeckichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Wisniewski v. GREAT A. & P. TEA. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- In the Matter of ShigonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.