Liddell v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN, District Judge.
THIS MATTER COMES BEFORE THE COURT on a Motion for Summary *448Judgment [407] filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc.1 [“NGSB”] on September 15, 2011. Plaintiff Tammi Liddell [“Liddell”],2 who is proceeding pro se in this matter, has filed a Response [409], and NGSB a Rebuttal [410]. After due consideration of the record, the submissions on file, and the relevant legal authorities, the Court finds that because Liddell is unable to maintain her claims as a matter of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gallentine v. Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2013
- Brooks v. Firestone Polymers, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2014
- O'Neal v. Cargill, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016
- Bracken v. WelbornDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2021
- Cox v. Scott County School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.