Legal Opinion

People v. Coleman

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1978No. Crim. 17020PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RACANELLI, P. J.

On appeal from an order made following entiy of a jury verdict finding defendant’s sanity had not been restored, 1 defendant puts the sole question as whether the People have a right to a jury trial in special proceedings undertaken pursuant to Penal Code section 1026a. 2 Examination of the substance of defendant’s claim supports our conclusion that the corollary and dispositive issue is whether the defendant has a right to a nonjury trial on the issue of his restored sanity.

Facts

The facts pertinent to our discussion are undisputed:

In June 1976, defendant was found not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. People v. Gary W.California Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. FeagleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In Re FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Teal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. SwordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. People v. HerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. People v. MappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. Superior Court (Almond)California Court of Appeal · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API