Legal Opinion
People v. Mapp
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 1983No. A019321PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINBERG, J.
On this appeal from an order of recommitment in a Penal Code section 1026.2 1 proceeding, the major question is whether appellant was deprived of a right of constitutional dimension, 2 because the court directed the jury to find that appellant’s sanity had not been restored. We affirm.
The facts are not in dispute. In June 1979 appellant was charged with assault upon a correctional officer with a deadly weapon or by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, while in state prison (§ 4501) and inflicting great bodily injury (§ 12022.7). On July 19, 1979, the court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. BarrazaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. BarrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. SeveranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. BeardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. C.M. CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.