Legal Opinion
Guiness v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 14, 1924No. 236PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
This suit is instituted under section 9 of the Trading with the Enemy Act (40 Stat. 411), as amended (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 3115%e), to recover from the Alien Property Custodian or the Treasurer of the United States the property of Delbruck, Schickler & Co. for an indebtedness admitted to be due on an account stated as of December 31, 1916. On April 6, 1917, Delbruck, Schickler & Co. were indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of 1,079.35 marks as of January 1, 1916, and this was acknowledged by that firm when the account was stated December 31, 1916. .Thereafter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Brown v. HiattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Birge-Forbes Co. v. HeyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Robertson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Katcher v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marilyn W. Pearson, as Administratrix of the Goods, Chattels and Credits of John S. Pearson, Deceased v. Northeast Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- The MuskegonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
- Zimmerman v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Miller v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Arnold v. EllisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.