Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Ellison

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1928No. Appeal 164Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Plaintiffs sued defendants in assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. After a statutory demurrer had been overruled, defendants filed a supplemental affidavit of defense averring that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiffs obtained a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense which the court below made absolute as to the principal of the amount claimed and discharged as to items of interest. Defendants have appealed.

It appears from the pleadings that plaintiffs were in 1914 co-partners and were engaged in the business of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. R. Ribas Y Hijo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Hicks v. GuinnessSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Siplyak v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Commercial Cable Co. v. SameDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API