Legal Opinion
Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. ExxonMobil Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 3, 2002No. Civil Action 98-4897(WHW), 00-3841(WHW)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
This is a complicated dispute concerning the alleged misuse of a patent and alleged overcharges of royalties to a partnership. In the first lawsuit, Civil Action No. 98-4897(WHW) (“NJ-I”), Plaintiff Saudi Basic Industries (“SABIC”) moves to clarify or reform a March 10, 2000 Stipulation where it agreed not to practice a technology that is the subject of a patent dispute. SABIC also moves pursuant to Rule 12(c) for partial judgment on the pleadings to strike Defendant ExxonMobil's (“Exxon”) defenses of unclean hands and setoff. Exxon cross-moves to dismiss…
2Cases cited110 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. Mobil Yanbu Petrochemical Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Exxon Mobil Corporation Exxon Chemical Arabia, Inc. Mobil Yanbu Petrochemical Company, Inc. v. Saudi Basic Industries CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Worthington v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- MBIA Insurance v. Royal Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.