Worthington v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we consider the scope of the “unclean hands” defense to an action for trademark infringement. 1 Appellants Gary Worthington and Colleen Worthing-ton appeal from the district court’s order dismissing, after a bench trial, their action against the defendants for federal and common law trademark infringement, deceptive trade practices, misrepresentation and false designation of origin under the Lanham Act, and conspiracy. 2 The district court concluded that the Worthing-tons’ claims against the defendants (referred to collectively here as the “Andersons”)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services, Inc. v. NudellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Worden v. California Fig Syrup Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Kenman Engineering v. City of UnionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. Lens.Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Saldivar v. RodelaDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
- Helton v. ReedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
- Ward Hardwood Floor Service, Inc. v. Jenkins (In Re Jenkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- In re Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.