Noyes v. Huffman
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion ?of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
A. J. Coll, one of the defendants, appeals by the alternative method from a decree quieting the plaintiff’s title to land in Fresno County. The suit was against one Huffman, Josephine E. Warner, formerly Rybka, Coll, and fictitious defendants. Huffman and Mrs. Warner defaulted and the suit was dismissed as to the fictitious defendants, leaving Coll as the only active defendant. Apparently he admitted the legal title of the plaintiff and claimed a right of conveyance from the plaintiff under a series of contracts, of which none are printed in the briefs. Neither was there printed in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Snell v. WelchMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- Scott v. Hollywood Park Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Mills v. Rossiter Eureka Etc. Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Tobey v. RandallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baucum v. LeBaronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955