Legal Opinion

Orzechowski v. Higgins

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 26, 1959PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The defendants have appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court entered upon a jury’s verdict. They assign error in the denial of their motion to set aside the verdict as not supported by the evidence on the issue of liability and as excessive, in the charge, and in rulings on evidence. Only two of the assigned errors need be considered in order to dispose of this appeal.

We shall consider first a ruling on evidence. The plaintiff was struck by the automobile of the named defendant when it was being operated by her husband, the defendant John J. Higgins, on Huber Street in New Britain at 8…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. D'AMATO v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  3. Masterson v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  4. Borucki v. MacKenzie Brothers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. United Mine Workers of America v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. River Dock & Pile, Inc. v. O & G Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. McCahill v. Town & Country Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Crest Plumbing & Heating Co. v. DiLoretoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  4. In re Kelly S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. Maggi v. MendilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API