In the Matter of McNeely
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
In Davis v. Davis1 we held 10 O.S. 1981 § 11302 to be a public-law/state-action statute whose grounds are invocable only by the state. The question here is whether the subsequent amendment of that statute, 10 O.S.Supp.1986 § 1130(D), which allows a private termination suit to be brought upon § 1130 grounds, may be applied retroactively to validate the father’s claim to severance of maternal ties in this case. We answer in the negative and reverse the trial court’s order that declared the parties’ child to stand in a “deprived” status and terminated the mother’s bond.
*1296Custody of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Trinity Broadcasting Corp. v. Leeco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- McCracken v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Griggs v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Strelecki v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Forest Oil Corp. v. Corporation Com'n of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.