Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Blondeau
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 1932No. Docket No. 985PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered following an order sustaining, without leave to amend, a general and special demurrer of the Louis K. Liggett Company to a second amended cross-complaint. This is an appeal in the same action as that of the City of Los Angeles v. Blondeau et al., bearing our Civil No. 986 (ante, p. 136 [15 Pac. (2d) 553], the opinion in which has this day been filed and in which the facts necessary to that appeal are set forth. They will not be repeated here.
The amended cross-complaint, in addition to the facts set forth in the opinion in the companion case, alleges…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- City of Pasadena v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- City of Los Angeles v. BlondeauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. KlopstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Arizona Corp. Commission v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1948
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. HartleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Simon Newman Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.