Legal Opinion

United States v. Dicupe

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 4, 1982No. ACM 23515PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

HEMINGWAY, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the accused was convicted of the larceny of $1,000.00 from the Zaragoza Officers’ Open Mess, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for eight months and reduction to airman first class. The case is now before us on both a petition for new trial and assignment of errors.

The accused was being employed, during his off-duty time, as a night manager at the Zaragoza Officers’ Open Mess. In his capacity as a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. RivasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. Edwin Charles Fortes, Jr., United States of America v. Sandra Elaine JemisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. JeffersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. KelleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. JanisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. DiCupeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. WoodyardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. PittsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. DupasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
  5. United States v. KoonceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API