Commonwealth v. Lux
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that the juvenile court erred in certifying him to criminal court to stand trial as an adult. Because the record is inadequate to permit our review, we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
A juvenile delinquency petition was filed against appellant alleging that he and two companions had robbed a pizza deliveryboy at rifle-point. The Commonwealth sought to have appellant, then 17 years old, certified to stand trial as an adult in criminal court. Following a certification hearing on July 8,1980, appellant was…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commonwealth v. BeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. GreinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. HarrodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. MaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. McKeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. DeppellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. MaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.