Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McKee

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1982No. 184PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN der VOORT, Judge:

Appellant was tried with a co-defendant, one David Mar-tell. Appellant was convicted of escape, conspiracy to escape, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, conspiracy to commit unauthorized use, aggravated assault and conspiracy to commit aggravated assault. Appellant raises two issues on this appeal:

I. Whether the trial court erred in transferring appellant’s case to the criminal division?

II. Whether the verdicts of guilty of escape and conspiracy to commit escape were against the evidence and the law?

Co-defendant Martell appealed his conviction to this court at No. 184…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. GreinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. HarrodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. LuxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. BroomeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. BroomeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. McKeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API