Commonwealth v. McDonald
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this case we are called upon to determine whether the trial court provided an adequate statement of its reasons for certifying the juvenile appellant to be tried as an adult. Applying the reasoning espoused by our Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Devers, 519 Pa. 88, 546 A.2d 12 (1989), we find the certification statement adequate, and the grounds for certification sufficient. Consequently, we affirm judgment of sentence.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On July 4, 1988, John Sanders, age 20, was squirting the fifteen year old appellant and a friend, Paul James Oliver, with a squirt…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commonwealth v. DeversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. BeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. BrunerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Interest of JAGNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. McGinnisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.