Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Harrod

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1978No. 1656PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends that we should remand for a new certification hearing because the lower court’s reasons for certifying appellant to stand trial as an adult were not sufficiently specific to allow this Court to make a meaningful review. Because we agree, we remand for a new certification hearing.

On September 15,1976, Philadelphia police arrested appellant on charges stemming from the robbery one hour earlier of Thelma Haines. Appellant was 17 years old. On November 3, 1976, after a hearing, the Juvenile Division of the lower court certified appellant to stand trial as an adult. In making…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. BeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. KeeferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. GreinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. SandersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. MaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. LuxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. MartellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API