Legal Opinion

Safarian v. Maserati North America, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided June 11, 2008No. Case SACV 08-0355 DOC (RNBx)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROCEEDING (IN CHAMBERS): DENYING MOTION FOR INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER

DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Maserati North America, Inc.’s (“Maserati”) Motion for an Intradistrict Transfer For Improper Division or Convenience under 28 U.S.C. 1404. The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local R. 7-15. After considering the moving, opposing and replying papers, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant’s Motion.

On December 21, 2006, Plaintiff Michelle Safarían (“Safarían”) purchased a 2006 Maserati 3200GT from Reyes European in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Guthy-Renker Fitness, L.L.C. v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
  4. STX, Inc. v. Trik Stik, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1988
  5. Clayton v. WarlickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. (PC) McCoy v. KelsoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. Carranza-Contreras v. Ally Financial IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
  3. Colon v. NCAADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. It's My Seat, Inc. v. Hartford Capital LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
  5. Kageta Tech LLC v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API