Legal Opinion

(PC) McCoy v. Kelso

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 18, 2019No. 1:12-cv-00983Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY, ) Case No. 1:12-cv-000983-AWI-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 13 v. ) FOR CHANGE OF VENUE 14 STRONACH, et al., ) [ECF Nos. 187, 191] ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Joseph Raymond McCoy is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a change of venue, filed October 21, 2019. 20 I. 21 RELEVANT BACKGROUND 22 This action is proceeding against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Park v. Dole Fresh Vegetables, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  4. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Safarian v. Maserati North America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API