Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Warlick

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1956No. 7148PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

232 F.2d 699

109 U.S.P.Q. 174

Bonjamin CLAYTON, doing business under the fictitious name

and style of Refining, Unincorporated, Petitioner,

v.

Honorable Wilson WARLICK, District Judge of the United

States District Court for the Western District of

North Carolina, Respondent.

No. 7148.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 22, 1956.

Decided April 9, 1956.

Charles M. Thomas, Washington, D.C. (John M. Robinson, Charlotte, N.C., and Barron F. Black, Norfolk, Va., on the brief), for petitioner.

James B. Craighill, Charlotte, N.C., for respondent.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Center Cadillac, Inc. v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  2. H. L. Green Company, Inc. v. The Honorable Lloyd F. MacMahonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Polaroid Corporation v. CasselmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  4. Scheinbart v. Certain-Teed Products CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  5. De Luxe Game Corp. v. Wonder Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API