Legal Opinion

Dunham v. Stone

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 7, 1950No. 3895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

The question to be determined in this case is whether or not there was sufficient evidence on which jurors could properly *139find for the plaintiff on the matter of future pain and suffering beyond the day of the trial. If there was evidence from which the jury could find it more probable than otherwise that such damage would occur (L’Esperance v. Sherburne, 85 N. H. 103, 113) that issue was improperly withdrawn from the consideration of the jury and plaintiff's exception must be sustained. Shepardson v. Perkins, 58 N. H. 354, 355; Walker v. Railroad, 71 N. H. 271, 273; Lamkin v. Johnson, 72 N.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Motts v. Michigan Cab Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Cluster v. UptonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. Wilks v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Shockley v. ParvisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Raymond J. Pittman v. Harold A. Littlefield, E. Kenneth Littlefield, Edith L. Howard, D/B/A Littlefield Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  2. Ackerman v. MarchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  3. Brandon Stachulski v. Apple New England, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  4. Burt v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Dunham v. StoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API