Wilks v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court. — flo». Carr McNatt, Judge. (1) The court erred in giving plaintiff’s instruction number 1. Dowling v. Allen, 102 Mo. 213; Czernicke v. Erlich, 212 Mo. 395; Zellars v. Light Co., 92 Mo. App. 119; Clark v. Railroad, 179 Mo. 66; Mueller v. Shoe Co., 109 Mo. App. 506; Brands v. Car Co., 213 Mo. 714; Musick v. Packing Co., 58 Mo. App. 300; Each v. Railroad, 117 Mo. App. 11; Clonts v. Light Co., 144 Mo. App. 582; Lee v. Railroad, 150 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court. — flo». Carr McNatt, Judge. (1) The court erred in giving plaintiff’s instruction number 1. Dowling v. Allen, 102 Mo. 213; Czernicke v. Erlich, 212 Mo. 395; Zellars v. Light Co., 92 Mo. App. 119; Clark v. Railroad, 179 Mo. 66; Mueller v. Shoe Co., 109 Mo. App. 506; Brands v. Car Co., 213 Mo. 714; Musick v. Packing Co., 58 Mo. App. 300; Each v. Railroad, 117 Mo. App. 11; Clonts v. Light Co., 144 Mo. App. 582; Lee v. Railroad, 150 Mo. App. 175. (2) Said instruction number 1 is erroneous because it does not present to the jury the case pleaded and presented to…
1Opinion of the CourtGray, J.
Action for personal injuries, which respondent claims he sustained on the 23rd day of February, 1911, while in the employ of the defendant. The plaintiff was eighteen years of age on the 15th day of November, 1910. He commenced to work for the defendant on the 15th day of February, 1911. His duties were to assist another employee in coaling en*717gines, and were performed at night. In coaling the engines a machine known as a Brown hoist was used. The hoist and the engine operating it were located on a flat ear built for the purpose. The hoist was a common steam shovel. It had a boom or a long…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hewett v. Woman's Hospital Aid Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
- Stuart v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Wojtylak v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Hendrix v. Vale Royal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Monroe v. Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Traylor v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Walker v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Mahoney v. PearceWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
- Lorden v. StappArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Allen v. Quercus Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.