Legal Opinion
Dunham v. Stone
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 7, 1950No. 3895Published
1Opinion of the Court
96 N.H. 138 (1950)
PERLEY E. DUNHAM
v.
ROBERT STONE.
No. 3895.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire.
February 7, 1950.
Howard B. Lane (by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.
Ernest L. Bell, Jr. and James S. Davis (Mr. Davis orally), for the defendant.
LAMPRON, J.
The question to be determined in this case is whether or not there was sufficient evidence on which jurors could properly find for the plaintiff on the matter of future pain and suffering beyond the day of the trial. If there was evidence from which the jury could find it more probable than otherwise that such damage would occur (L'Esperance v.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Motts v. Michigan Cab Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Cluster v. UptonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Wilks v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Dunham v. StoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950
- Shockley v. ParvisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1874