Burt v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

The issue in this case is whether there was evidence to warrant submission to the jury of the special question, whether plaintiff’s injury, for which he seeks benefits under defendant’s policy, was one which did not arise out of or in the course of his employment so as to come within the coverage. Defendant’s exceptions were transferred by Dunfey, J.

Plaintiff was employed at Homestead Woolen Mills, Inc. which for the benefit of its employees carried a group insurance policy with the defendant. The policy covers disabilities *30from injuries only if they do “not arise out of or in the course of…