Legal Opinion

State Deptartment of Public Welfare v. LeMere

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The department does not proceed upon the theory that it is a third-party beneficiary of the support agreement.2

The department contends that as an unpaid creditor of Mrs. LeMere it may, under secs. 312.16 and 312.17, Stats., reach the property conveyed to Gerald because he has failed to perform his agreement with her.

Gerald LeMere contends that because of the special type of claim asserted by the department, it is not entitled to proceed under secs. 312.16 and 312.17, Stats. This was the conclusion of the circuit court. Gerald further contends that the provision of the agreement for a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lundberg v. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Zartner v. HolzhauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State Department of Public Welfare v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Glojek v. GlojekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Keske v. Marshall & Ilsley BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chilcote v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of WisconsinDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
  2. County of Milwaukee v. Northrop Data Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. Keiting v. SkaugeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  4. In Matter of Estate of RuedigerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Randal Strauss v. Chubb Indemnity Insurance CompCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API