Keiting v. Skauge
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
The issue on appeal is whether a contract which reduces the statutory limita tions period for commencing a tort action and which runs the reduced time period from the date of the injury is subject to the discovery rule of Hansen v. A.H. Robins, Inc., 113 Wis. 2d 550, 335 N.W.2d 578 (1983). We hold that the contract provision is not governed by the discovery rule and does not violate public policy. We therefore affirm the summary judgment.
The controlling facts are not disputed. On July 17, 1992, the appellant, Rick Keiting, entered into a written contract with the respondent, Newcomer's Home…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Merten v. NathanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Katze v. Randolph & Scott Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Brownelli v. McCaughtryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Lundberg v. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gustine Uniontown Associates, Ltd. Ex Rel. Gustine Uniontown, Inc. v. Anthony Crane Rental, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Trinity Church v. Lawson-BellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- College of Notre Dame of Maryland, Inc. v. Morabito Consultants, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Harbor Court Associates v. Leo A. Daly Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Borowski v. Firstar Bank Milwaukee, N.A.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.