Keske v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The questions are: (1) Did the personal representative. of Paul Keske, deceased, have any duty to perform with respect to the circuit court action ? (2) Was Elmer properly considered legally incompetent to be the personal representative because of inability to perform such duty?
1. Duty of personal representative. Elmer argues that the personal representative of a deceased has no interest in an action for rescission or cancellation of a conveyance of land made by the deceased unless there is a deficiency of assets to pay creditors of the estate, expenses of administration, or (under some…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clark v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Zartner v. HolzhauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Holzhauer v. ZartnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Blochowitz v. BlochowitzNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Neelen v. HolzhauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Racine v. SkowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Estate of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- In Re Estate of MossNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Keleske v. KeleskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State Deptartment of Public Welfare v. LeMereWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.