Legal Opinion

Keske v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The questions are: (1) Did the personal representative. of Paul Keske, deceased, have any duty to perform with respect to the circuit court action ? (2) Was Elmer properly considered legally incompetent to be the personal representative because of inability to perform such duty?

1. Duty of personal representative. Elmer argues that the personal representative of a deceased has no interest in an action for rescission or cancellation of a conveyance of land made by the deceased unless there is a deficiency of assets to pay creditors of the estate, expenses of administration, or (under some…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Zartner v. HolzhauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Holzhauer v. ZartnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Blochowitz v. BlochowitzNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Neelen v. HolzhauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Racine v. SkowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Estate of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. In Re Estate of MossNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Keleske v. KeleskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State Deptartment of Public Welfare v. LeMereWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API