Legal Opinion

Alberts v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 19, 2014No. C 14-01587 RSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

RICHARD SEEBORG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION .

Karen Alberts was employed as a police officer for the University of California. As a university employee, she was covered by a supplemental disability insurance plan provided by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (“Liberty”). In 2009, Al-berts sustained a wrist injury for which she received short-term disability benefits from Liberty. In February 2012, Liberty determined she was ineligible to receive long-term benefits and therefore stopped paying…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Schroeder v. Auto Driveaway Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Charles Wetzel v. Lou Ehlers Cadillac Group Long Term Disability Insurance Program Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Klees v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. Pollock v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  3. Vega v. Management and Training CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API