Alberts v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
RICHARD SEEBORG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION .
Karen Alberts was employed as a police officer for the University of California. As a university employee, she was covered by a supplemental disability insurance plan provided by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (“Liberty”). In 2009, Al-berts sustained a wrist injury for which she received short-term disability benefits from Liberty. In February 2012, Liberty determined she was ineligible to receive long-term benefits and therefore stopped paying…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Schroeder v. Auto Driveaway Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Charles Wetzel v. Lou Ehlers Cadillac Group Long Term Disability Insurance Program Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klees v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Pollock v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Vega v. Management and Training CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023