Klees v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as to both counts. (Dkt. No. 15.) Having heard oral arguments and considered the parties’ submissions, the Court adopts the following order.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is a former employee of the University of California (UC) system who alleges that she was provided disability insurance coverage by Defendant pursuant to an agreement with the university. (First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), ¶ 6.) Plaintiff alleges that she suffered “sickness and injury”…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Neal Horsley v. Gloria FeldtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bruce v. Hartford Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019