Legal Opinion
State v. McNichols
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1995No. 62431-3PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
906 P.2d 329 (1995)
128 Wash.2d 242
STATE of Washington, Petitioner,
v.
Paul K. McNICHOLS, Respondent.
No. 62431-3.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
November 30, 1995.
Honorable Jim Sweetser, Spokane County Prosecutor, Kevin M. Korsmo, Deputy Prosecutor, Spokane, for petitioner.
Winston & Cashatt, Carl E. Hueber, Thomas M. McBride, Spokane, for respondent.
MADSEN, Justice.
This case arises out of the conviction of Paul K. McNichols of driving while intoxicated. At issue is (1) whether Washington's implied consent statute imposes an affirmative duty on jail personnel to advise DWI suspects regarding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. JudgeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CanadayWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. StannardWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. SargentWashington Supreme Court · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. MoralesWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- STATE DEPT. OF LICENSING v. GrewalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. ChakerianNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.