Legal Opinion
United States v. Salamanca
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided January 23, 2003No. CR. 02-40052-01-KESPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SCHREIER, District Judge.
[¶ 1] On January 15, 2003, the government gave notice of proposed expert testimony of Carlos Bernadino. Bernadino’s testimony would relate to his translation of an undercover recording from Spanish to English. Defendant, Marcos Salamanca, objected to this expert testimony on two grounds. First, the court had appointed Bernadino as an interpreter for Salaman-ca. Since July, Bernadino has interpreted conversations between Salamanca and his attorney; therefore, Bernadino’s testifying for the government presented a conflict of interest. Second,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Grajales-MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Marian Hutter Owen v. Herbert Wangerin, Mary Wangerin, Dave ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Paul v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- State v. PhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Formosa Plastics Corp., USA v. Kajima International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Hewlett-Packard Co. v. EMC Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Crenshaw v. Mony Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004
- Thornton v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004
- In Re McCarterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.