Legal Opinion

Deardorff v. Farnsworth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 4, 2015No. CV10040782; A152357PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE MUNIZ, S. J.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court correctly held that defendant Oregon Mutual Insurance Company (OMI) was estopped from relying on an exclusion in an insurance policy. Plaintiffs were transporting horses in California that were owned by others when the trailer carrying the horses caught on fire, killing the horses. The insurers for the horse owners compensated the horse owners for their losses and then filed an action against plaintiffs in California, alleging that plaintiffs had negligently caused the death of the horses. Plaintiffs tendered the defense of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Cimarron Insurance v. Travelers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Bennett v. CITY OF SALEMOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. ABCD...Vision, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Marshall v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Progressive Universal Ins. Co. v. VoylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. Nelson v. Liberty Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Progressive Universal Ins. Co. v. VoylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API