ABCD...Vision, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Defendant insurer, Fireman’s Fund Insurance Companies, petitioned this court to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, which affirmed a declaratory judgment of the trial court holding that insurer was liable under an insurance policy for damages sustained to the property of the insured plaintiff, ABCD...Vision, Inc. ABCD...Vision, Inc. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Companies, 84 Or App 645, 734 P2d 1376 (1987). We allowed review to decide the issue whether the insurer was estopped from asserting two policy exclusions as defenses to the claimed damages of the insured because insurer had failed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brink v. . Hanover Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Schaffer v. Mill Owners Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Simmons v. Civil Service Employees InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- R. W. McCormick & Son v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Ward v. Queen City Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Potesta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Intel Corp. v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1988
- Design Data Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- García Curbelo v. Autoridad de las Fuentes FluvialesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1991
- Northwest Pump & Equipment Co. v. American States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.