Legal Opinion

Keller v. American Cyanamid Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 1, 1942No. Docket 139/462PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant was formerly employed by the defendant company at its Calco plant at Bound Brook, New Jersey. After a hearing, he was discharged from this employment on November 6th, 1941. The termination of his services was undoubtedly the disciplinary action initiated by the defendant union and taken by the company in consequence of his alleged disobedience of a clause incorporated in article I of an agreement between the company and the union. Concisely stated, the complainant now seeks a decree nullifying the supposed validity of this clause of the agreement, enjoining its enforcement,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Dooley v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
  4. Manning v. FeidelsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Dooley v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kuzma v. Millinery Workers, Etc., Local 24New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Rice Holman v. United Elec., R. M.W., AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API