Legal Opinion

Manning v. Feidelson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1940PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice MciKiNNet

The hill seeks to enjoin defendant trustee from distributing a $20,000^ fund in his hands so as to exclude complainant and the class of employees that she represents.

The trustee filed a plea in abatement alleging that he was acting in his capacity as Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board; hence the court was without jurisdiction of his person. His counsel also moved for a dissolution of the injunction. The chancellor sustained the plea in abatement and dissolved the injunction. The parties have treated this as a dismissal of the bill, although the decree does not., so…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Brennan v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Jordan v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Ridley v. HallidayTennessee Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. First American Trust Co. v. Franklin-Murray Development Co., L.P.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. In Re Estate of Ardell Hamilton TriggTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Toms v. TomsTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In re CreagerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  5. Inwards v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API