Legal Opinion

Dooley v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. of Pennsylvania

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 5, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The decree under review is affirmed, for the reasons expressed by Vice-Chancellor Egan in his opinion reported in ISO N. J. Kg. 75.

In the opinion, however, the learned Vice-Chancellor discusses the question of the right of John J. Buckley, general chairman of the System Board of Adjustment of the Brotherhood and of the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, &c., itself to represent the clerks as bargaining agent with the employer Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. This question we do not consider necessary to the determination of the case and we consequently express no opinion…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1961
  2. Milk Drivers, Local 680 v. Cream-O-Land DairyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Owens v. Press Publishing Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Gainey v. Local 71, International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Kennedy v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API