Legal Opinion

State v. Eisenbarth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1988No. 87-12157-C; CA A45765PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

In this prosecution for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, the state appeals the allowance of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. We reverse.

The trial court found the facts:

“Trooper Tow observed the car driven by the Defendant. on North Pacific Highway in the area known as the ‘Big Y.’ The officer indicated that the vehicle driven by the Defendant was going slower than the posted 35 mile per hour speed limit. Trooper Tow estimated that Mr. Eisenbarth’s speed was 20 to 25 miles per hour at this location. As the officer passed the Defendant the officer was able to get…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. SpenstCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. State v. KimmelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TerhearCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. MorelliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API