Legal Opinion
Stanfield v. Osborne Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 23, 1993No. 92-4048-RDRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action against the defendants alleging two claims under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq., and various supplemental common law claims. Plaintiffs claims arise from the defendants’ use of “Stanfield” in two trademarks they have registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. This matter is presently before the court upon defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The court has heard oral argument and is now prepared to rule.
The three counts alleged in plaintiffs complaint are as follows: (1) a claim for unfair…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Phillip W. Stanfield v. Osborne Industries, Inc., Stanley M. Thibault, Ronald ThibaultCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Stanfield v. Osborne Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Dual Groupe, LLC v. Gans-Mex LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Hot Wax, Inc. v. Turtle Wax, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Fuel Clothing Co. v. Nike, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.