Legal Opinion

Hot Wax, Inc. v. Turtle Wax, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 19, 1998No. 97 C 3646PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Hot Wax sues defendant Turtle Wax for false advertising under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125. Hot Wax alleges that Turtle Wax falsely markets and advertises certain products as waxes, when in fact the products do not contain any wax. The parties have submitted cross-motions for summary judgment.

Hot Wax contends that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because its experts have determined — and the defendant’s expert has admitted — that the products in question do not contain wax. In light of this admission,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Heublein, Inc. And Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hot Wax, Inc. v. Turtle Wax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. 3M Innovative Properties Co. v. Dupont Dow Elastomers LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
  3. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  4. Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Lear Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  5. Kepner-Tregoe, Inc. v. Executive Development, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API