Legal Opinion
Phillip W. Stanfield v. Osborne Industries, Inc., Stanley M. Thibault, Ronald Thibault
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 11, 1995No. 94-3020PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Phillip W. Stanfield brought this action against defendants Osborne Industries, Inc. (Oil), Stanley M. Thibault, and Ronald M. Thibault alleging two claims under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C §§ 1051-1128, and various state common law claims. Plaintiffs claims arise from Oil’s use of two trademarks containing the word “Stanfield.” The district court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to the Lanham Act claims and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. Stanfield v. Osborne Indus., Inc., 839 F.Supp. 1499, 1508…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Universal Money Centers, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., and Universal BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Selenke v. Radiology ImagingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Famous Horse Inc. v. 5th Ave. Photo Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Exxon Corporation v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc. And Oxxford Clothes Xx, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.