Legal Opinion

McCarthy, Admr. v. Adams

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1932No. 1246PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLemert, J.

On the first question presented, that the Court sustained the motion to strike the ordinance from the amended petition, we note that §3714 GC provides as follows:

“Municipal corporations shall have special power to regulate the use of the streets, to be exercised in the manner provided by law. The council shall have the care, supervision and control of public highways, streets, avenues, alleys, sidewalks, public grounds, bridges, aqueducts, and viaducts, within the corporation, and shall cause them to be kept-open, in repair, and free from nuisance.”

After the passage of the above statute, we…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. LenahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Stewart v. Standard Publishing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Struzik v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Marsh v. McLAUGHLIN ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Headley v. Hammond Building, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API