Couric v. City of Eufaula
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
This appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions.
By assignment of errors, appellant insists: (1)' “The verdict of the jury is invalid”; (2) “Judgment based on said verdict is invalid.”
Neither of the foregoing insistences can be sustained. The well-considered brief filed here in behalf of appellee is a complete and thorough answer to appellant’s contentions.
The words “Disorderly conduct,” appearing in the caption of the judgment, were no part of the judgment, and in no manner essential to the validity thereof. If considered at all, these words could be deemed as mere…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Hardeman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Casey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Swinea v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hanson v. SmythSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
- Peinhardt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954