Legal Opinion

Swinea v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1928No. 8 Div. 674PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

This appeal has been considered by the court sitting en bane. The entire record, including all of the evidence adduced upon the trial and the record proper, has been thus read and considered.

The action of the court below in overruling the motion for a new trial is not presented. In seeking a review by the appellate .courts. upon the ruling of the lower court overruling a motion for a new trial, the statute does not require that the motion and judgment thereon shall be set out in the bill of exceptions, but under the statute (Code 1923, § 6088) it is mandatory that the dill of exceptions must…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Langston v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Couric v. City of EufaulaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Hern v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API