Legal Opinion

Hoover v. First Nat. Bank of Port Lavaca

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1917No. 5783PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

The First National Bank of Port Lavaca, Tex., on April 3, 1914, sued appellants, Hoover and Hartzog, for $4,209.91 upon their promissory note payable to plaintiff. Plaintiffs at the time of filing suit caused an attachment to be issued and levied upon 640 acres of land in Calhoun county belonging to Hoover. On July 21, 1914, plaintiff caused a second writ of attachment to be levied on about 6,000 acres of land. The ground alleged for said attachments was “that said defendants are about to dispose of their property with the intent to defraud their creditors, and that each of the defendants is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trawick v. Martin Brown Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Girard v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Moser & Son v. Charles E. Tucker & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Chase v. York County Savings BankTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Nixon v. First State Bank of HamlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gudger v. MantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Davis v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Keystone Pipe & Supply Co. v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Tsesmelis v. Sinton State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Spillman v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API