Legal Opinion

Moser & Son v. Charles E. Tucker & Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1894No. 119PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Questions Certified from Court of Civil Appeals for Third District, in an appeal from McLennan County.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

The facts on which questions certified are based are, that Moser & Son, an insolvent firm, for valuable consideration, assigned to others an unexpired leasehold estate extending from October 4, 1888, to October 1, 1891, in part of a lot and store house thereon, which the assignees sublet from time of assignment to May 7, 1889, receiving therefor as rent $115 per month.

Charles E. Tucker & Co. were creditors of Moser & Son at time lease was assigned, and on their claim recovered a judgment on May 8, 1889, on which execution issued that was returned “ nulla bona.” On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hendricks v. SnedikerTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Watson v. . DoddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  3. Edwards v. NortonTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Daugherty v. Cox's Adm'rTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Dyer v. Carr'sSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Powell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. In Re HowertonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1982
  3. Birdwell v. BurlesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Steger v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Reynolds v. McCullough, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API