Legal Opinion

Keystone Pipe & Supply Co. v. Crabtree

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1935No. 23483PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, filed its action against Crab-tree Brothers & Devine, a copartnership, upon a verified account, and on July 27, 1929, caused an attachment to be issued and levied on 230 acres of land belonging to one D. C-Crabtree, who was not a member of the co-partnership and not a defendant in the action. This attachment was dissolved January 7, 1931. On October 3 1930, the said D. C. Crab-tree filed his interplea setting up his ownership of the land and praying for dissolution of the attachment, and for damages in the sum of $8,625 and $250 attorney's fees. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barker v. Campbell-Ratcliff Land Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Barnes v. KeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Ramey v. StephneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Stump v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Anderson v. SloaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gudger v. MantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Halliburton Oil Producing Co. v. GrothausSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Continental Supply Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. Samson Hydrocarbons Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Davis v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API