Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Hedlund

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 19, 1932No. 21339PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.

The parties will be referred to as they appear in the lower court. Plaintiff was the owner of 160 acres of land located in Caddo county, Okla., in the Cement oil field.

The lease on the southeast 40 acres was owned and operated by Jackson, Moran & Roome, copartners and defendants herein. Plaintiff had not leased the northeast 40 acres adjoining defendants’ 40 acres and had drilled a producing well thereon. She entered into negotiations with Mr. Roome, a member of the copartnership, relative to defendants’ pumping her well at $50 per month, and claimed that a contract was entered into on that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Florence v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Kelley v. McKaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Arbuthnot v. BorenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Margay Oil Corp. v. JamisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Smith v. YohoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Codapony v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Boswell v. Shawnee Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Oklahoma City v. HeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API