Arbuthnot v. Boren
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Harper County; Arthur G. Sutton, Judge. Action by H. C. Boren against J. G. Ar-buthnot. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
This action was brought by the defendant in error, as plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant below, to recover a real estate broker’s commission. Prom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant has appealed.
It is first contended that the verdict and judgment are not supported by the evidence, The defendant contends that the plaintiff sued on an express contract, whereby he contended that the defendant agreed to pay a commission of five per cent, for making a sale of the real estate for $40,000, and that the undisputed evidence in the case shows that no .such…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fitch v. BraddockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Gillett v. CorumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jackson v. HedlundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Mid-Continent Life Insurance Co. v. WylieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Gunter v. SartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929