Legal Opinion

Morris Ex Rel. Morris v. Sprott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.

We think bis Honor’s bolding, as a matter of law, tbat a child of seven years of age is incapable of being guilty of contributory negligence is in conflict with tbe decisions of tbis Court, which are to tbe effect tbat contributory negligence on tbe part of a child is to be measured by bis age and bis ability to discern and appreciate tbe circumstances of danger; and is not chargeable with tbe same degree of care as an experienced adult, but is only required to exercise such prudence as one of bis age may be expected to possess; and tbis is usually, if not' always, when tbe child is not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rolin v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Tart Ex Rel. Tart v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Fry v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Foard Ex Rel. Foard v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walston v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Weeks Ex Rel. Weeks v. BarnardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Boykin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Absher Ex Rel. Absher v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Walston v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API